8/07/2550

Music Digital Do you know?




As regular readers know, The Digital Music Weblog is retiring as of today. The blog will continue to exist as a searchable archive. Grant and Gordon, who have written so splendidly in this space, are staying in the network. Whenever we make a change, there is some disappointment among readers, and sadness for everyone -- including those of us involved in decision-making. We take it all seriously; nothing about this is capricious. TDMW has lived close to our hearts, and especially close to mine. This blog was my starting point at WIN (read this if you're interested). It was a little tough to let it go when I was hired by AOL, but Grant, Gordon (Tommy Perkins and Sharky Laguna before them) have done an amazing job carrying onward the blog's relentless examinations of the RIAA's colossal machinations and the opportunistic maneuvers of the indie music scene. And it's tough now to move the blog into retirement.It's important to point out that a blog retirement is not a blog failure. Here at Weblogs, Inc. we are continually honing our network to be the best content engine for readers and bloggers both. In part, that means figuring out how to divide our resources that, sadly, are not infinite. We have changed tremendously in the last three years, expanding wildly at the start into a sort of bulk publishing model, then refining and contracting somewhat into a leaner machine. We have more bloggers than ever before, and fewer blogs than a year ago. That means a dazzling concentration of minds and voices in our chosen fields of publication. A good example is Grant Robertson's ferocious blogging at Download Squad, his new home. I speak for everyone on the Weblogs, Inc. team when I give the greatest appreciation to our amazing bloggers, who wake up every single day thinking, "What will I dig up today?" Professional blogging is unlike any other freelance writing gig, in both its relentless schedule and editorial freedom. I am always proud of our team, and frequently awed. Finally, thanks to everyone who took an interest in The Digital Music Weblog, both casual visitors and dedicated readers


8/03/2550

Preview Digital Camera

Digital Camera Product Reviews / Previews

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/default.asp?view=rating

Reviews: By conclusion rating
Remember: Review ratings are given at the time of review (indicated beside the camera name) as an overall rating for the camera as it performed in our review tests, in comparison to other cameras in its class, price range and which were available / announced at the time of review. Ratings are the opinion of the reviewer. You must take the time to read reviews fully to be able to draw your own conclusion about a particular camera.

Highly Recommended

Olympus E-410 (6/14/2007)
Nikon D40X (5/27/2007)
Fujifilm FinePix F31 fd (4/11/2007)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 (2/7/2007)
Nikon D40 (12/20/2006)
Canon PowerShot A640 (12/19/2006)
Pentax K10D (12/15/2006)
Canon PowerShot A710 IS (12/13/2006)
Fujifilm FinePix S6000 fd (12/6/2006)
Pentax K100D (12/3/2006)
Canon PowerShot G7 (11/17/2006)
Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi (10/14/2006)
Nikon D80 (9/23/2006)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 (9/8/2006)
Sony DSLR-A100 (7/31/2006)
Fujifilm FinePix F30 Zoom (7/25/2006)
Canon PowerShot SD700 IS (7/16/2006)
Sony DSC-H5 (7/4/2006)
Sony DSC-H2 (6/28/2006)
Canon PowerShot S3 IS (5/19/2006)
Canon EOS 30D (4/4/2006)
Nikon D200 (2/23/2006)
Sony DSC-R1 (12/6/2005)
Canon PowerShot A620 (11/28/2005)
Canon EOS 5D (11/12/2005)
Canon PowerShot S80 (11/8/2005)
Olympus E-500 (10/21/2005)
Sony DSC-P200 (10/12/2005)
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II (10/11/2005)
Nikon D50 (7/23/2005)
Sony DSC-H1 (7/5/2005)
Adobe Photoshop CS2 (6/23/2005)
Canon PowerShot S2 IS (6/21/2005)
Nikon D2X (6/1/2005)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5 (4/8/2005)
Canon EOS 350D / Digital Rebel XT (4/6/2005)
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D (1/17/2005)
Canon PowerShot G6 (12/2/2004)
Sony DSC-V3 (12/2/2004)
Adobe Photoshop Elements 3.0 (11/15/2004)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20 (11/4/2004)
Canon EOS 20D (11/3/2004)
Canon PowerShot S70 (10/27/2004)
Fujifilm FinePix E550 Zoom (10/22/2004)
Sony DSC-P150 (9/23/2004)
Canon PowerShot A95 (9/17/2004)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ3 (9/14/2004)
Canon PowerShot S60 (8/13/2004)
HP Photosmart R707 (8/13/2004)
Canon EOS-1D Mark II (6/14/2004)
Olympus C-8080 Wide Zoom (4/20/2004)
Nikon D70 (4/5/2004)
Nikon D2H (12/19/2003)
Pentax *ist D (10/28/2003)
Adobe Photoshop CS (9/29/2003)
Canon EOS 300D / Digital Rebel (9/4/2003)
Canon PowerShot A70 (8/13/2003)
Sony DSC-V1 (7/1/2003)
Canon PowerShot S400 (4/28/2003)
Canon EOS 10D (3/31/2003)
Canon EOS-1Ds (12/17/2002)
Canon PowerShot G3 (12/5/2002)
Canon PowerShot S45 (11/11/2002)
Sony DSC-F717 (10/7/2002)
Nikon Coolpix 5700 (8/23/2002)
Nikon Coolpix 4500 (8/16/2002)
Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro (8/2/2002)
Nikon D100 (7/26/2002)
Minolta DiMAGE 7i (6/21/2002)
Canon PowerShot S330 (4/23/2002)
Minolta DiMAGE S404 (4/9/2002)
Canon EOS D60 (3/24/2002)
Canon EOS-1D (12/13/2001)
Canon PowerShot S40 (10/9/2001)
Nikon D1H (9/19/2001)
Sony DSC-F707 (8/21/2001)
Canon PowerShot G2 (8/17/2001)
Nikon D1X (6/29/2001)
Sony DSC-S85 (6/7/2001)
Nikon Coolpix 995 (5/8/2001)
Color Vision Monitor Spyder (4/12/2001)
Unity Digital Firewire CF reader (3/15/2001)
Sony Mavica CD200 (3/7/2001)
Sony Mavica CD300 (3/2/2001)
Sony DSC-S75 (2/26/2001)
Olympus E-10 (1/16/2001)
Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS (1/6/2001)
Nikon D1 (11/27/2000)
Canon EOS D30 (10/10/2000)
Canon PowerShot G1 (10/2/2000)
Sony DSC-F505V (7/27/2000)
Nikon Coolpix 990 (4/17/2000)
Sony DSC-F505 (8/30/1999)
Nikon Coolpix 950 (4/19/1999)
Kodak DCS620 (3/3/1999)
Kodak DCS520 (2/17/1999)
Canon PowerShot Pro70 (12/25/1998)


Recommended

Canon PowerShot S5 IS (7/27/2007)
Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro (7/5/2007)
Canon PowerShot TX1 (6/8/2007)
Nikon Coolpix P5000 (5/17/2007)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 (4/11/2007)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 (4/4/2007)
Pentax Optio A20 (3/5/2007)
Kodak C875 (2/27/2007)
Canon PowerShot SD900 (1/29/2007)
Canon PowerShot SD800 IS (1/11/2007)
Samsung NV10 (10/19/2006)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2 (10/10/2006)
Casio Exilim EX-Z1000 (9/17/2006)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1 (8/4/2006)
Casio Exilim EX-Z850 (4/24/2006)
Canon PowerShot A700 (4/11/2006)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01 (3/27/2006)
Olympus E-330 (3/18/2006)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 (2/20/2006)
Canon PowerShot SD450 (2/8/2006)
Kodak P880 (1/19/2006)
Kodak P850 (12/22/2005)
Samsung Pro815 (12/7/2005)
Olympus SP-310 (11/21/2005)
Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Z (10/31/2005)
Canon PowerShot SD550 (10/12/2005)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1 (9/30/2005)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30 (9/16/2005)
Sony DSC-W7 (8/31/2005)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX9 (8/26/2005)
Canon PowerShot SD400 (8/11/2005)
Casio Exilim EX-Z750 (6/10/2005)
Fujifilm FinePix F10 Zoom (5/9/2005)
Nikon Coolpix 7900 (4/26/2005)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ2 (4/21/2005)
Canon PowerShot SD500 (4/15/2005)
Canon PowerShot A510 (4/4/2005)
Canon PowerShot A520 (3/31/2005)
Pentax *ist DS (3/31/2005)
Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 (3/24/2005)
Olympus Stylus Verve (2/24/2005)
Sony DSC-L1 (2/7/2005)
Konica Minolta DiMAGE A200 (2/2/2005)
Fujifilm FinePix S5100 Zoom (1/13/2005)
Olympus E-300 (1/10/2005)
Nikon Coolpix 8400 (1/4/2005)
Nikon Coolpix 8800 (1/4/2005)
Epson P-2000 (12/23/2004)
Pentax Optio S5i (12/20/2004)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX7 (12/9/2004)
Casio Exilim EX-P700 (12/2/2004)
Olympus C-7000 Zoom (12/2/2004)
Canon PowerShot SD300 (11/24/2004)
Fujifilm FinePix F810 Zoom (10/13/2004)
Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z2 (9/9/2004)
Nikon Coolpix 5200 (8/26/2004)
Sony DSC-F88 (8/26/2004)
Canon PowerShot S1 IS (8/13/2004)
Kodak DCS SLR/c (6/29/2004)
Leica Digilux 2 (5/10/2004)
Canon PowerShot Pro1 (4/20/2004)
Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 (4/20/2004)
Nikon Coolpix 8700 (4/20/2004)
Sigma SD10 (3/19/2004)
Fujifilm FinePix S7000 Z (1/18/2004)
Sony DSC-F828 (1/10/2004)
Olympus E-1 (11/29/2003)
Minolta DiMAGE A1 (11/11/2003)
Nikon Coolpix 3100 (8/13/2003)
Canon PowerShot S50 (8/5/2003)
Canon PowerShot G5 (7/1/2003)
Nikon Coolpix 5400 (7/1/2003)
Kodak DCS 14n (5/20/2003)
Casio Exilim EX-Z3 (5/2/2003)
Pentax Optio S (5/2/2003)
Pentax Optio 550 (4/26/2003)
Olympus C-5050 Zoom (1/16/2003)
Adobe Photoshop Album 1.0 (1/6/2003)
Sigma SD9 (11/26/2002)
Minolta DiMAGE 7Hi (11/1/2002)
Minolta DiMAGE F100 (10/9/2002)
Fujifilm FinePix F601Z (6/24/2002)
Fujifilm FinePix S602Z (4/29/2002)
Nixvue Vista (4/27/2002)
Sony DSC-P9 (4/18/2002)
Sony DSC-P71 (3/14/2002)
Nikon Coolpix 2500 (3/13/2002)
Nikon Coolpix 5000 (1/20/2002)
Casio QV-4000 (11/20/2001)
Olympus E-20 (10/29/2001)
Minolta DiMAGE 5 (9/23/2001)
Minolta DiMAGE S304 (9/4/2001)
Nikon Coolpix 885 (9/4/2001)
Think! Fire-N-Ice (8/11/2001)
Kodak DCS760 (7/16/2001)
Minolta DiMAGE 7 (7/9/2001)
Fujifilm FinePix 6900 Zoom (6/21/2001)
Nixvue Digital Album (6/13/2001)
Canon PowerShot A20 (4/24/2001)
Canon CP10 (4/19/2001)
Olympus C-3040 Zoom (4/17/2001)
Canon PowerShot S300 (3/21/2001)
Hoodman Accessories (3/15/2001)
Olympus C-2100 UZ (12/4/2000)
Sony DSC-P1 (9/12/2000)
Nikon Coolpix 880 (8/28/2000)
Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro (8/8/2000)
Sony DSC-S70 (6/27/2000)
Minds@Work Digital Wallet (6/20/2000)
Kodak DCS620x (6/14/2000)
Olympus C-3030 Zoom (5/8/2000)
Nikon Coolpix 800 (12/15/1999)
Olympus C-2000 Zoom (7/12/1999)
Sony DSC-D700 (6/14/1999)

8/02/2550

CNN Web

http://www.cnn.com/TECH Update new technology at Here!!!


Hey you, with the iPod...keep it down!

Apple's ubiquitous iPod is best known as an instrument of solitude -- unless the user ignores standards of etiquette by invading the eardrums of fellow commuters, officemates or other innocent bystanders. Then it starts to get annoying. full story

Top Technology Stories

Russia to sink flag to Arctic Sea floor
NASA probing cabin leak aboard shuttle
PopSci: Optics for better camera phones
Cell phones light emergency surgery
Time: A YouTube for the VIPs
Spaceship maker fights bankruptcy
Carnival wins rights to QE2 Web site

from: http://www.cnn.com/TECH

7/31/2550

iphone technology

The First 30 Days of iPhone: We Want to Hear From You

Compared with other cell phones, the iPhone's been under a microscope since its launch. I actually can't remember a phone that's been this closely scrutinized since Palm's Treo 650--and that was mostly because the thing crashed all the time. At the end of month 1 of the iPhone era, we'd love to hear what you think about Apple's first phone. Are you still deleriously happy? Have you had any problems? Take our survey and let us know.
So far, the iPhone owners around our office seem pretty happy, and reports of serious issues in the blogosphere don't seem too widespread. Things aren't completely bug-free, though. Apple Hound's iPhone Bug List details 68 bonafide bugs and other issues. Of those, only seven are classified as a "serious bug"--one involving a crash/hang/data loss.
Other users--including PC World's own Kimberly Brinson--have experienced battery issues. When Brinson let her iPhone battery run down, the phone wouldn't restart after charging. She took the phone to a store--where a Genius Bar staffer got the phone to restart after about four attempts. "I shook my head and said, 'I've only done that at least 100 times already today.' He just shrugged and said you have to keep trying to restart it 'until you're blue in the face.'"
The battery gotcha looks to haunt Apple beyond just the performance question. The company has received complaints from New York and Illinois (which has already filed a class-action lawsuit) over the phone's integrated battery design--which in turn requires users to turn over their cell phone and pay $79 plus shipping to have the battery replaced.
That hassle aside, Brinson has mostly praise for the phone. Her perspective echoes that which I've heard from other iPhone users--here at PC World, out in the world, and in the blogosphere. Some have taken to iPhone wish lists: our colleagues over at Playlist have assembled their own missive of what it would like to see in the iPhone.
Gripes include the slow AT&T EDGE network, no integrated chat client, lack of customization, and the phone's lack of wireless synchronization. Praise goes out to the touch screen, the keyboard (after you get used to it), and the music player. Semi-professional photographer Jim Goldstein, who was first in line for the phone last month, loves how digital images display on the high-resolution screen, but was disappointed by the phone's camera. Another user calls it the best phone he's ever had (he's gone through 20 so far).

from:http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/005035.html

7/26/2550

Phone Technology

Qualcomm posts higher profit, raises outlook

NEW YORK — Qualcomm Inc posted a quarterly profit that rose 24 percent on Wednesday (July 25), handily beating Wall Street estimates on strong demand for high-end mobile phones using its chips and technology licenses.
Its shares rose as much as 3.5 percent in after hours trade after the company also raised its full-year earnings and revenue outlook on rising average phone prices.
Qualcomm net profit rose to $798 million, or 47 cents share for its fiscal third quarter ended in June, from $643 million, or 37 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.
Excluding its investment arm, Qualcomm said it earned 55 cents per share compared with average analyst expectations for 51 cents per share, according to Reuters Estimates.
Revenue rose to $2.33 billion from $1.95 billion a year ago and compared with analyst revenue estimates of $2.26 billion.
Cowen & Co analyst Matthew Hoffman said Qualcomm's technology royalty business appeared to have been boosted by higher-than-expected average selling prices for phones, boosting its third-quarter and its fourth-quarter outlook.
"Clearly, they had very strong June quarter results. It was a solid top line beat, a good portion of which fell to the bottom line," said Hoffman, also noting that the outlook had beaten consensus estimates. He rates the stock "outperform."
Qualcomm raised its estimate for average selling prices for mobile phones to $216 for its fiscal year 2007, ending in September, up from its previous estimate of $208, likely indicating strong demand for high-end phones, Hoffman said.
Chief Financial Officer Bill Keitel said the better-than-expected results were due to increasing demand for third-generation (3G) phones with high-speed Web links.
"The entire 3G market which we earn royalties off grew to be quite a bit stronger than we expected," and Qualcomm chip sales were at the high end of expectations, Keitel said.

IMPROVED OUTLOOK
Excluding its investment arm, Qualcomm forecast full-year 2007 earnings per share of $1.95 to $1.97, up from its previous forecast of $1.84 to $1.88. This compared with average analyst estimates for $1.91 per share, according to Reuters Estimates.
It raised its revenue outlook for the year to a range of $8.72 billion to $8.82 billion from its earlier expectation for revenue of $8.4 billion to $8.7 billion and above analyst expectations for revenue of $8.71 billion.
Qualcomm -- the main chip supplier for phones based on CDMA, the mostly widely used mobile phone technology in the United States -- faces several legal cases including a government ban on the U.S. sale of some phones with its chips.
Qualcomm shares were up 1.9 percent at $43.28 in late trade after closing at $42.45 in regular Nasdaq trade.
Piper Jaffray analyst Michael Walkley said uncertainty around legal battles surrounding Qualcomm was stunting investors' reactions to its results.
"If you didn't have a legal issue out there I would have thought the stock would have been up more. Legal issues are the main focus now," Walkley said.
Qualcomm has been battling chip maker Broadcom Corp in patent infringement cases, one of which led the International Trade Commission (ITC) on June 7 to ban the U.S. import and sale of new advanced phones with Qualcomm chips. The ban exempted phones already being imported on June 7.
Last week, No. 2 U.S. mobile service Verizon Wireless, which depends largely on phones with Qualcomm chips, said it agreed to pay Broadcom $6 per phone or a total of $200 million for a license pact to avoid the ITC ban. Verizon wireless is owned by Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc .
Qualcomm told analysts on a conference call that it had preliminary discussions with Verizon Wireless about the potential for it to help out with the payments to Broadcom. Qualcomm did not give an estimate for how much it could pay.
But based on the life of the Broadcom patents, the number of handsets Verizon Wireless tends to sell and the $200 million payment cap Keitel noted that the per handset price Verizon agreed to appears "closer to a dollar than to six."
Keitel said it was not yet clear if the ban was hurting Qualcomm's chances of winning new orders for its chips.
San Diego-based Qualcomm has also been in a bitter dispute with leading mobile phone maker Nokia after they failed to renew an expired technology license pact.
Executives for Qualcomm, which has asked arbitrators to handle the Nokia case, said they expect an arbitration panel for the case to be selected soon. The panel would then set the timeline for the case.By: Sinead Carew
Copyright 2007 Reuters.